I’ve looked at Sleep Sorting before. The basic idea is that each scalar in your collection to be sorted will be used as it’s own weight, which is then used as the delay before outputting it as output.
In a perfect world, all elements are sent to this time-based output buffer at the same instant, in which case the results will be accurate.
When I did this before in javascript, the results were accurate because javascript is an asynchronous language. When you call setInterval
, other things can happen before that interval is complete.
PHP is not asynchronous. You could imagine looping through a collection and calling sleep
before each echo
and that this would be a basic sleep sort implementation. This doesn’t work because in PHP sleep is blocking. The result will be a script that waits the sum of the array seconds in total, and outputs the order unchanged.
function sleepcount($sleepnum) { sleep($sleepnum); echo "$sleepnumn"; } foreach($nums as $num){ sleepcount($num); }
There are several methods of implementing threading in PHP. A beta PHP extension called pthreads is one way to do this. Here’s an implementation based on the pthreads Async example:
function sleepcount($sleepnum) { sleep($sleepnum); echo "$sleepnumn"; } class Async extends Thread { public function __construct($method, $params){ $this->method = $method; $this->params = $params; $this->result = null; $this->joined = false; } public function run(){ if (($this->result=call_user_func_array($this->method, $this->params))) { return true; } else return false; } public static function call($method, $params){ $thread = new Async($method, $params); if($thread->start()){ return $thread; } } } $nums = array( 6, 2, 4, 1); foreach($nums as $num){ $future = Async::call("sleepcount", array($num)); }
On my development machine this does not product the correct results. It only sorts elements pairwise, so my result is
2, 6, 1, 4
This is likely because my development machine has a dual core processor. That’s just part of the fun of concurrent programming I suppose.
There may be a better way of implementing this in pthreads. I wouldn’t know. I’m only currently getting my feet wet with it.